topology optimization
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.68)
NTopo: Mesh-freeTopologyOptimizationusing ImplicitNeuralRepresentations
Deep neural networks are starting to show their potential for solving partial differential equations (PDEs)inavarietyofproblemdomains,includingturbulentflow,heattransfer,elastodynamics,and many more [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Thanks to their smooth and analytically-differentiable nature, implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions are emerging as a particularly attractive and powerful option in this context [4].
A surrogate model for topology optimisation of elastic structures via parametric autoencoders
Giacomini, Matteo, Huerta, Antonio
A surrogate-based topology optimisation algorithm for linear elastic structures under parametric loads and boundary conditions is proposed. Instead of learning the parametric solution of the state (and adjoint) problems or the optimisation trajectory as a function of the iterations, the proposed approach devises a surrogate version of the entire optimisation pipeline. First, the method predicts a quasi-optimal topology for a given problem configuration as a surrogate model of high-fidelity topologies optimised with the homogenisation method. This is achieved by means of a feed-forward net learning the mapping between the input parameters characterising the system setup and a latent space determined by encoder/decoder blocks reducing the dimensionality of the parametric topology optimisation problem and reconstructing a high-dimensional representation of the topology. Then, the predicted topology is used as an educated initial guess for a computationally efficient algorithm penalising the intermediate values of the design variable, while enforcing the governing equations of the system. This step allows the method to correct potential errors introduced by the surrogate model, eliminate artifacts, and refine the design in order to produce topologies consistent with the underlying physics. Different architectures are proposed and the approximation and generalisation capabilities of the resulting models are numerically evaluated. The quasi-optimal topologies allow to outperform the high-fidelity optimiser by reducing the average number of optimisation iterations by $53\%$ while achieving discrepancies below $4\%$ in the optimal value of the objective functional, even in the challenging scenario of testing the model to extrapolate beyond the training and validation domain.
- Europe > Spain > Catalonia > Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
Optimize Any Topology: A Foundation Model for Shape- and Resolution-Free Structural Topology Optimization
Nobari, Amin Heyrani, Regenwetter, Lyle, Picard, Cyril, Han, Ligong, Ahmed, Faez
Structural topology optimization (TO) is central to engineering design but remains computationally intensive due to complex physics and hard constraints. Existing deep-learning methods are limited to fixed square grids, a few hand-coded boundary conditions, and post-hoc optimization, preventing general deployment. We introduce Optimize Any Topology (OAT), a foundation-model framework that directly predicts minimum-compliance layouts for arbitrary aspect ratios, resolutions, volume fractions, loads, and fixtures. OAT combines a resolution- and shape-agnostic autoencoder with an implicit neural-field decoder and a conditional latent-diffusion model trained on OpenTO, a new corpus of 2.2 million optimized structures covering 2 million unique boundary-condition configurations. On four public benchmarks and two challenging unseen tests, OAT lowers mean compliance up to 90% relative to the best prior models and delivers sub-1 second inference on a single GPU across resolutions from 64 x 64 to 256 x 256 and aspect ratios as high as 10:1. These results establish OAT as a general, fast, and resolution-free framework for physics-aware topology optimization and provide a large-scale dataset to spur further research in generative modeling for inverse design. Code & data can be found at https://github.com/ahnobari/OptimizeAnyTopology.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region > Dawei (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.68)
SPhyR: Spatial-Physical Reasoning Benchmark on Material Distribution
We introduce a novel dataset designed to benchmark the physical and spatial reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLM) based on topology optimization, a method for computing optimal material distributions within a design space under prescribed loads and supports. In this dataset, LLMs are provided with conditions such as 2D boundary, applied forces and supports, and must reason about the resulting optimal material distribution. The dataset includes a variety of tasks, ranging from filling in masked regions within partial structures to predicting complete material distributions. Solving these tasks requires understanding the flow of forces and the required material distribution under given constraints, without access to simulation tools or explicit physical models, challenging models to reason about structural stability and spatial organization. Our dataset targets the evaluation of spatial and physical reasoning abilities in 2D settings, offering a complementary perspective to traditional language and logic benchmarks.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Europe > Monaco (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
- Information Technology (0.93)
- Asia > China (0.28)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England (0.14)
- Information Technology > Information Management (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.68)
- Information Technology > Data Science (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
- Information Technology (0.93)
- Health & Medicine (0.87)